White PaperWP-PROOF-01v1.06 May 2026Public Distribution35 pages12 MB
The Decision Proof Gap
Why AI governance fails at the moment of execution
By Sam Carter

Abstract
AI governance frameworks describe how decisions should be made — but at the moment a consequential decision is executed, the evidence required to defend it almost never exists in a verifiable form. This paper names that structural gap, traces it across regulated sectors, surveys why existing solutions (explainability, logs, policy-as-code, model cards) fail to close it, and proposes the Decision Receipt as the missing primitive: a signed, replayable, portable record bound to the policy in force at the moment of decision.
- “Most institutions can show you the system. Few can show you the decision.”
- “AI governance sits before the decision and after it — never at it.”
- “Reconstruction is not proof. It is a story told later.”
- “The systems can change. The proof remains.”
PDF · 35 pages · 12 MB