Skip to main content

Use casesAML decisions

Fraud and AML decisions you cannot prove.

Every day, millions of AML decisions are made. When asked to explain them, most organisations can't produce a verifiable Decision Receipt.

MeshQu changes that.

Signals

Transaction data
Customer profile
Risk signals
Watchlists
Device / IP

Decision

AML decision at execution

Approve · Block · Escalate

Proof

Decision Receipt

Verified

01The moment

A decision is made.

A rule triggers. A model produces a score. An analyst reviews the case.

A decision is made: Approve, Block, or Escalate.

Transaction flagged

Payment to new payee

Amount
£12,540.00
Customer
John D.
Rating
87 High risk
ApproveBlockEscalate

02The failure

You are asked to explain it later.

Why was this transaction allowed? What rules fired? What signals were considered?

The answer is reconstructed from logs, dashboards, model outputs, case notes. It takes time. Sometimes hours. Sometimes days.

Reconstructing the decision…

  • Search logs45 min
  • Check rule outcomes30 min
  • Review model output20 min
  • Pull case notes30 min
  • Build explanation60+ min

That's not proof.

03The reason

It was never captured at execution time.

AML systems are built to detect and act — not to produce a verifiable record of the decision itself. No Decision Receipt is produced.

The decision happens. The proof doesn't.

Signals received

Logs written

The gap

No verifiable proof captured

04The shift

Decisions should produce proof.

Not reports. Not narratives. Not reconstructed timelines.

A decision should leave behind a verifiable record at the moment it is made.

Signals received

Logs written

Decision + Proof

At execution

05At execution

Captured as it happens.

Most AML systems capture decisions after they happen.

MeshQu captures them at execution time.

After the fact is audit. At execution is control.

TRCUWA

MeshQu Decision Layer

Decision Receipt

Verified

06The receipt

Every decision produces a receipt.

A Decision Receipt contains the inputs, the policy applied, the rules that fired, the outcome, and the actor.

Signed. Verifiable. Replayable. No reconstruction required.

Decision ReceiptTransaction DecisionDR-K7M9-2P4Q
Verified
Decision
Approved by Risk Committee
Policy
Third-party risk — Tier 1, v7
Evidence
3 attestations, 2 documents
Integrity
sha256:0xdead…beef

07A new layer

It works with what you already use.

Transaction monitoring. Fraud engines. Case management systems. MeshQu doesn't replace them.

Your systems decide. MeshQu proves.

TM
Fraud
Case mgmt
Watchlists
MeshQu
— receipt
decisionblock
policyAML-v4.1
actoranalyst

sealverified ◎

08Consistency

Every path produces the same proof.

Automated screening. Analyst review. Model-assisted disposition. It doesn't matter — every decision produces the same receipt.

Screen → review → disposition. The steps hash-link as they happen and seal when the case closes. A chain proves the workflow.

Automated decision

Rule + model

Analyst review

Case worker

Model-assisted

Score + override

Same receipt, every time.

09The result

You can answer while the question is fresh.

The receipt resolves in seconds — what happened, why, under which policy, with what inputs. Verifiable.

Asked

Why was this transaction allowed?

RCP-01H7M12B7G6SNP2 VerifiedResolved in 2.1 seconds
Does this replace our transaction monitoring or case management?
No. MeshQu captures the decision your TM and case-management systems already produce.

10Close

You already make these decisions.

The question is — can you prove them?

Decision AssuranceCapture every decision. Prove every time.
Book a demo