- Decision
- Approved by Risk Committee
- Policy
- Third-party risk — Tier 1, v7
- Evidence
- 3 attestations, 2 documents
- Integrity
sha256:0xdead…beef
Use casesVendor decisions
Vendor decisions you cannot justify.
MeshQu changes that.
Signals
Decision
Vendor decision at execution
Approve · Reject · Accept risk
Proof
Decision Receipt
Verified
01The moment
A vendor is approved.
A supplier is onboarded. A risk assessment is completed. A control is waived.
A decision is made: Approve, Reject, or Accept risk.
Vendor onboarding
Acme Cloud Services Ltd.
- Tier
- Tier 1 · Critical
- Region
- EU / UK
- Posture
- Material gaps Residual risk
02The failure
You are asked to justify it later.
Why was this vendor approved? What risks were identified? Why were they accepted? Who signed it off?
The answer is reconstructed from risk assessments, onboarding systems, documents, and email approvals. It takes time. It's incomplete. It doesn't hold up under scrutiny.
Reconstructing the approval…
- Pull risk assessment40 min
- Find SOC + DPA versions30 min
- Locate exception sign-off60+ min
- Recover email thread45 min
- Build justification90+ min
That's not proof.
03The reason
It was never captured at execution time.
Third-party risk systems track vendors and store documents — they don't capture the decision itself as verifiable evidence. No Decision Receipt is produced.
The approval happens. The proof doesn't.
Signals received
Logs written
The gap
No verifiable proof captured
04The shift
Risk decisions should produce proof.
Not documentation. Not scattered evidence. Not reconstructed timelines.
A vendor decision should leave behind a verifiable record at the moment it is made.
Signals received
Logs written
Decision + Proof
At execution
05At execution
Captured as it happens.
Most risk systems record decisions after they are made.
MeshQu captures them at execution time.
After the fact is audit. At execution is control.
MeshQu Decision Layer
Decision Receipt
Verified
06The receipt
Every vendor decision produces a receipt.
A Decision Receipt contains the vendor details, the risk signals, the policy applied, the controls evaluated, the outcome, and the actor.
Signed. Verifiable. Replayable. No reconstruction required.
07A new layer
It works with what you already use.
Vendor onboarding systems. Risk assessment tools. Document repositories. Approval workflows. MeshQu doesn't replace them.
Your systems manage vendors. MeshQu proves the decision.
08Consistency
Human or system. Same proof.
Automated tiering. Manual assessment. Committee approval. Exception handling. Every decision produces the same receipt.
A risk attestation submitted through a form produces the identical signed receipt as an automated check. A signed form is a signed receipt. Same shape. Same proof.
Automated assessment
Tier + signals
Manual review
Risk team
Committee approval
With dissent noted
Same receipt, every time.
09The result
You can answer immediately.
The receipt resolves in seconds — what happened, why, under which policy, with what inputs, and who accepted the residual risk. Verifiable.
Asked
Why was this vendor approved?
Does this replace our vendor risk or GRC system?
10Close
You already make these decisions.
The question is — can you justify them under scrutiny?